Daniel Webster belongs to the first generation of Americans who
knew no other form of government than that established by the
Federal Constitution. So intimately is his name associated with
that great document that he has become known to history as the
greatest expounder of the Constitution.
Tampering with the Constitution. - When but 20 years old, he
delivered an address which contained the following:
"The experience of all ages will bear us out in saying that
alterations of political systems are always attended with a greater
or less degree of danger. The politician that undertakes to improve
a constitution with as little thought as a farmer sets about
mending his plow is no master of his trade. If the Constitution
be a systematic one * * * its parts are so necessarily connected
that an alteration in one will work an alteration in all, and
the cobbler, however pure and honest his intentions, will in
the end find that what came to his hands a fair, lovely fabric
goes from them a miserable piece of patchwork * * *."
Representative government. - As a further caution against a pronounced
tendency, he declared:
"The true definition of despotism is government without
law. It may exist in the hands of many as well as one. Rebellions
are despotisms, factions are despotisms, loose democracies are
despotisms. These are a thousand times more dreadful than the
concentration of all power in the hands of a single tyrant The
despotism of one man is like the thunderbolt which falls here
and there, scorching and consuming the individual on whom it
lights; but popular commotion, the despotism of the mob, is like
an earthquake, which in one moment swallows up everything. It
is the excellence of our Government that it is placed in a proper
medium between these two extremes, that it is equally distant
from mobs and from thrones."
Webster clearly understood our representative form of government
and the importance of avoiding the dangerous extremes of either
hereditary (autocratic) government or direct (democratic) government.
Reply to Hayne. - Webster's replies to Hayne in the United States
Senate are considered as the greatest debate that has ever occurred
in any legislative body in the history of the world. His second
reply began with the following words:
"Mr. President, when the mariner has been tossed for many
days in thick weather and on an unknown sea he naturally avails
himself of the first pause in the storm, the earliest glance
of the sun, to take his latitude and ascertain how far the elements
have driven him from his true course. Let us imitate this prudence
and before we float farther on the waves of this debate refer
to the point from which we departed that we may at least be able
to conjecture where we now are.
This indicates a wholesome state of mind with which to approach
important discussions concerning the philosophy of our Government
as expressed in the Constitution. Before we drift farther toward
direct action and socialistic tendencies, we should return in
study and thought to the work of the men who wrote the Constitution
and ascertain how far we are departing from the course therein
laid down." |