There are two kinds of liberty - absolute liberty: That of the
savage, in which any individual may act as he pleases; and civil
liberty: That of a civilized community in which human actions
are regulated by law for the good of all - subject only to such
restraints as a solemn and tolerant judgment determines to be
essential.
Political liberty is no other than natural liberty so far restrained
by human laws and no further, as is necessary and expedient for
the general advantage of the public. - Blackstone.
Liberty does not free the people from the necessity for control,
but it places a heavy burden of responsibility upon the individual
for self-control. It is not license to do as one pleases. Through
developed "intelligence" man has power to control his
baser and more selfish instincts, compelling their exercise and
restriction in the interest of society.
Minority control exercises its will until such time as general
intelligence becomes sufficiently informed to establish an order
of society with a larger and more even distribution of benefit
to all, and the law of will (force) is supplanted by the law
of reason.
As defined in the Preamble to the Constitution, liberty is the
absence of arbitrary human restraints upon personal conduct other
than those imposed by the authority of just laws, obedience to
which is an essential part of it.
Fundamental law. - The rights to life, liberty, and the
pursuit of happiness are beyond the right of any government to
legally usurp or infringe.
To secure this (liberty) is the main business of governments
and the reason for their institution. If they fall in this they
have failed in all. - Blackstone.
These principles were written by our fathers into a constitution
of government, for the first time in human history, when they
wrote the Constitution and it became the fundamental law of a
new nation dedicated to the proposition that "all men are
created equal" and that "government derives its just
powers from the consent of the governed."
Equality. - What is meant by "equality" is clearly
defined by Lincoln in his debate with Douglas.
In responding to Douglas's question, "What do you mean -
'all men are created equal?'" Lincoln replied:
"I think the authors of that notable instrument intended
to include all men, but they did not intend to declare all men
equal in all respects. They did not mean to say all were equal
in color, size, intellect, moral development, or social capacity.
They defined with tolerable distinctness in what respect they
did consider all men created equal - equal with "certain
inalienable rights, among which are life, liberty, and the pursuit
of happiness." This they said and this they meant. They
did not mean to assert the obvious untruth that all were then
actually enjoying that equality, nor yet that they were about
to confer it immediately upon them. In fact, they had no power
to confer such a boon. They simply meant to declare the right,
so that enforcement of it might follow as fast as circumstances
should permit." |